ShortStrings (no permalinks, but it was posted Tuesday, October 08, 2002), says Andrew Sullivan reports that Christopher Hitchens's new book on Orwell went from 1,074 to 4 on Amazon's best seller list after he chose it for his next book club discussion. (More...)
categories: memewatch metablog x-syndicate
12:17:30 PM 
say what []
I decided to try to plumb the native talent of clients and other people subscribed to the Waterside "virtual conference" mailing list:
I'm trying to arrange wireless access at the 2003 Waterside Conference (in Berkeley), and I wanted to ask the members of this list whether anyone has experience setting up this kind of impromptu wireless shared access in the past, especially in other conference settings. I plan to blog the conference and hope other participants will do so as well, providing live real-time coverage of keynote speakers, panels, workshops, and hallway encounters.
Here are some of things I'm trying to sort out:
- Will this work with one DSL or T1 ethernet access points, a hub to do DHCP, and one or more Airport or Linksys type wireless base stations? If we want to offer wireless access in the main auditorium as well as, say, in the demo room, would I need a second access point, or can a second base station pick up the network by being wthin range of the first base station?
In a nutshell, are there hardware elements I am overlooking or networking concepts I have egregiously wrong? I have a spare hub, yards of ethernet, and one base station, so I think I can provide almost everything just by stripping my office...- The hotel wants to know "how many computers" will be using the access, saying they need to set aside separate IP for each one. I think they don't understand DHCP or that they need to be told that one computer (my hub) will be needing just one IP address, thanks. It's all subnet masking behind the DHCP/NAT server, right?
- I'm obviously semiclueless about this stuff, so I'd like to take out to dinner anyone planning to come to the conference who knows more about such matters and who would be willing to help me in a pinch in configuring and setting up the access on site.
I'll keep you posted.
categories: metablog
11:17:31 AM say what []
It's Otis! He looooves us!. White liberal guilt has never been so deliciously skewered.
(via MZ)
categories: x-syndicate
9:17:55 AM say what []
I'm going to follow dws's model of how to do this (from his RadioFAQs channel). If you'd like to contribute occasional content to RFB, here's what you should do:
- Tell me you're interested (email is fine).
- Set up a "Blogistan" category in your blog.
- Send me the URL for the RSS feed for you new category.
- Post any content you want to contribute to RFB to that category, including a credit link to yourself (so that if we use the automatic aggregtion of the muliauthor tool, the posts will not appear to have been written by me).
- I'll do the rest.
To do so, I am planning a three-tiered approach to content submitted by outside contributors.
The first tier will be discretionary, in that I will subscribe to a potential contributor's RSS feed and manually post entries I feel are appropriate.
For anyone who consistently contributes content that makes it into RFB, I will proceed to the second tier, adding their feed to my multiauthor tool's list of incoming feeds and thereby automating the inclusion of their posts (removing my discretion from that step). I will continue to make the decisions about what categories posts belong in and, most importantly, whether they are to appear on the home page. A contributor on this level will appear on a new masthead page as a staff writer.
The third tier will only come into play if a staff writer becomes so involved as to be willing and able to take on a share of the responsibility of deciding which categories posts should go to, whether to include suggested entries from outside contributors, and which content belongs on the home page. If this tier comes into play, RFB will have fully transitioned to a publication model.
I don't know whether any of this will work. Maybe no one will want their content showing up here, but it will be an interesting experiment, and I hope it will continue to increase the value of this blog to those learning about weblogs.
If the content increases too quickly, most of the new contributions may appear in a special RSS-only feed. We'll see.
Other future plans I have for RFB include reforming the categories. I'll probably stop rendering non-blog-related categories here (such as fireweaver, memewatch, outspoken, and x-pollen), and add a few new blog-related categories, such as one for each of the major products.
Instead of using RFB as a central clearinghouse for my other blog posts (via x-pollen and the multiauthor tool), I'll treat it more as a blog-about-blogging channel that can, when necessary, be fed from other blogs.
Meanwhile, I plan to move my personal blogging from Bodega (at Livejournal) to a new x-pollen site. This blog will probably become my home base, feeding other topic-specific sites as needed. On the one hand, I like the differentiation of separate brands for separate types of content. On the other hand, simplicity is a virtue (and a pragmatic benefit) and that other way (toward infinite taxonomical subdivision) lies madness. On the third hand, inertia is powerful.
Meanwhile, if you are interested in contributing links and thoughts about blogging trends and phenomena to Radio Free Blogistan, if you have an idea for a subbeat you'd like to cover (such as a product-specific column), or just want to discuss these and related ideas, please drop a line to submit@radiofreeblogistan.com.
categories: metablog radioactive
9:06:10 AM say what []
